AHF Podcast

Part I: From Posterior Approach to Anterior Approach

Anterior Hip Foundation Season 2 Episode 1

Send us a text

Join me as I talk with Dr. Alex Sah and Dr. Michael Blankstein about transitioning to Anterior Approach during their practice.

Joseph M Schwab:

Hello and welcome back to the AHF Podcast. I'm your host, Joe Schwab. Most residents coming out of training today will have had some exposure to anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. Adult reconstruction fellows in the United States will often consider surgical approach as a key distinguishing factor when choosing fellowships. All of this is to say our young orthopedic learners are coming into practice with greater and greater levels of experience in anterior total hips. But what do you do if you're already an established surgeon and you're looking to add anterior approach as part of your practice? Has the opportunity already passed you by? How much time do you need to take from your practice to get comfortable with the approach and how steep is the learning curve? Well, my guests today have done just that. They're here to answer those questions for you. Joining me today is Alex Sah of Sah Orthopedic Associates at the Institute for Joint Restoration in Fremont, California and Dr. Michael Blankstein at the University of Vermont Medical Center in Burlington, Vermont. Both Mike and Alex started their practices doing posterior approach and have gone through the process of adopting anterior approach. Let's listen in on the conversation. Mike, Alex, thanks for joining me.

Alexander Sah:

Thank you, Joe.

Michael Blankstein:

for having us.

Joseph M Schwab:

When you were considering this process of changing your practice, moving from posterior approach and adding anterior approach, Um, what factors were you considering? Was it economics? Was it intellectual factors or simply outcomes or, or maybe something completely different, Alex, let's start with you.

Alexander Sah:

Those are all great considerations, Joe, and making that transition from a poster approach or different approach to anterior hip surgery. When I was in practice about 8 years ago, I was doing exclusively mini posterior approach. People are doing very well. People are going home same day already. And we're doing them at the also. So, for us, it seemed like we couldn't be doing any better. We're very happy with it. And I was looking at some of the other results being published, as we know, early literature on anterior hip replacement is very different than current literature on anterior hip replacement. So, a combination of factors we can talk about later, but probably because there were surges not, who should not have been doing anterior approach who were doing it. I think people were not learning appropriately and complications were much higher. Things being reported in the literature, I think, were not really showing. How well trained and You have surgeons were performing. So that kind of literature, that kind of negative backlash of the early growth of entry approach made me hesitant to adopt it. And again, things were going very well for me with my standard mini posterior approach. So at least for me, it wasn't about economics or more business or promotion or trying to be different or setting myself apart from others, which are perfectly reasonable ways and reasons for other people to adopt something new. But for me, it was simply a question that arose, which is, could I be better? I was very happy with what I was doing already, but the question was simply, was there a way where I could be even better? And if it wasn't for Joel Matta and Charlie DeCook, who approached me and were willing to teach me and asked me to be involved, I don't know if I would have converted. So, as You know, I was involved with the Anterior Hip Foundation early on and Charlie and Joel asked me to give a talk on Why I would even consider and your approach, having never done any and being the only post your hip surgeon in the room at the entry of foundation. Talk about being a black sheep. So I felt very out of place, but that meeting, as we all have grown to love is just such a amazing environment to learn from others and and ask questions that I quickly. started to do them myself. And, um, it was really because of that question. Could I be better? And Charlie was kind enough to come out and do with the first three cases with me. And after those three cases, I never looked back.

Joseph M Schwab:

Transcripts

Michael Blankstein:

heh, heh. slight differences. This is actually one of my favorite questions that people ask me, um, because I've truly changed my practice. So when I graduated in Canada, I finished my fellowship. I was very happy with my training, moved to Vermont in 2012. And one of my partners, Nathan Elms, who I hope listens to this, started doing the anterior approach at the time. We're essentially the same cohort. And when I graduated in Canada, I think there was nearly one anterior approach surgeon in the entire country. So it wasn't even something I thought about and I was so happy with the way things were going and I actually scrubbed it with my partner in my first year in practice and I literally remember thinking, is crazy. There's no way I'm ever going to do this. I was disoriented. I didn't know what's right, left, you know, posterior, anterior. The releases looked so challenging. And, um, and as a matter of fact, I, you know, as you know, I love academia and research and science and I could quote it. All the papers in the world that talked bad, said bad things about the interior approach, wound problems, the blood loss, the peripatetic fractures, the, uh, the stem loosening, like you name it, you know, the numbness and the curve. And it was just like, there's no way I was going to do it. Um, things started, actually started changing when I met you. Dr. Schwab, when we did the Hip Society Traveling Fellowship to the UK and you, we went to many meetings where you literally were the only one who did the anterior approach. So I felt very comfortable. I was like, okay, what the guys in Canada don't do it. The guys in the UK don't do this. So I'm good. Um, and I kept with my, hard minded approach of, hey, I'm sticking to the posterior approach. And then somebody once said to me something interesting, which was, how about you listen to your patients? What do they want? Why are they asking you for the anterior approach? And I'll tell you this one humbling experience that I had that really changed my practice. Um, it was one day we were sitting in a meeting and they were just talking about the wait times and access to care in Vermont. And they said, well, the waitlist to see Dr. Blankson, this is 10, this is five years in, I'm already doing a good job. I really don't have dislocations, you know, things are fine. to see Dr. Blankson is that, oh, you can see him next week. The waitlist to see Dr. Nelms is like five months. I'd rather learn a new approach and do what people want than speak badly about it for the rest of my career. Like, I'm a hip surgeon. I love doing hip surgery. Why not just learn a new approach? And this is really what I want to do here and really is compliment the AHF. And all the teachers that Alexi just mentioned, DeCook, Schwab, of course, the modern day Charlie, the modern day Charlie, Joe Matta. I said, you know, I'm going to go to their courses and the way the courses were taught, which is so responsible, right? So as hip surgeons, we've all seen bad things Okay. Okay. like you guys, I decided I'm gonna bark upon it, and just like, just like Joe, just like Alex said, like, haven't moved back. I haven't gone back. It's been really rewarding.

Joseph M Schwab:

So you had your partner was able to scrub in with you on your first few cases kind of help you through that process. Alex, what was that like for you?

Alexander Sah:

That was a challenge, Joe, because I was the only surgeon in my institution to be doing anti approach. So we were starting completely from scratch. So that means our nurses, our techs, our reps, right? We didn't, we just got our first Honda table. All of this was brand new, so that definitely was a challenge because suddenly now, as Michael said, has a surgeon, things are upside down and backwards. You're looking at the hip from a completely different perspective. You're trying to learn it yourself, but at the same time in the corner of your eye, you're trying to keep an eye on the person managing the table. Implant rep, the person running the C arm. There's a lot more coordination that that's something that is truly different with that approach because it's it's really a coordination of all the team members. So being the first person in my hospital to do it was a challenge. But when you asked about learning curve, I would say the learning curve, it depends on how you define it. Learning curve, you learn a little bit with it. for many, many cases. I think we all say we always learn when we do another anterior approach because we're always trying to find ways to be better. So that learning goes on for quite a long time. But when you're talking about a learning curve in terms of avoiding complications or problems with modern day training and and Joe has been involved with it a lot and is a great teacher of it. You can really avoid those complications early. So I think the learning curve actually can be very short with modern training.

Joseph M Schwab:

Um, that actually raises a question. So the, um, I, I, you I, I think the way that both, um, Alex and, and Mike that you've described your approach to the educational processes, uh, as a very positive one, um, what were the biggest challenges or the biggest, um, the, the biggest difficulties that you encountered during that educational phase or during that growth phase? of anterior approach in your practice.

Michael Blankstein:

I think the thing that was very important for me was not to have these early complications, right? I did, because then everyone knows, okay, so this is a posterior part surgeon, and now he's going to do the anterior part, and if he doesn't go well everyone's going to know about it. And I actually heard some stories about surgeons trying and things not going bad and reverting back to the posterior approach. So I think this is, again, one of the things that I learned from you guys, which is let's choose your first patients appropriately. Just in itself, just know when to do it, how to do it, have the support personnel. also don't change, another thing that I learned was very interesting, is don't change the implants. You have to, so for example, if you wanted to use an anterior friendly stem, then you have to get comfortable with that stem while doing surgery. The posterior approach. Um, and then it's learning, learning from every single step, everything. I'll give you another example was one of the biggest challenges I had in the beginning was cutting the neck through the front. And once it was too high, once it was too low, and I brought an extra, I'm like, okay, that's standardized. Boom. And it's like that every just think is that a whole bunch of little steps, you know,

Alexander Sah:

Early in the learning curve for me, Joe, you know, it really wasn't a challenge to learn the technique or go to a cadaver course, or there was so much opportunity on the web. There are videos. I mean, modern day training again is very, very different than early training. I mean, when I think those. learning curves were being published and they would be more challenging. Modern day training has V. R. It has web, it has, you know, all kinds of materials on the internet where you can watch videos. So really the only challenge when first adopting was really going somewhere to go to a course. It was really more of an inconvenience than a hurdle because you had to take time out of your practice. You had to go to a course and learn it. But It is well worth it because the ability to work in a cadaver lab, go to one of these educational courses that are now everywhere from various implant vendors is extremely helpful. And I think one of the best things for me at least was having that reverse visitation, having someone with you when you do your first, I think probably sped the learning curve up by 10 20 cases. Honestly,

Joseph M Schwab:

This episode of the A HF Podcast is brought to you by Mizuho, OSI. The HANA table has been transformative to my practice in so many ways. Once you realize what can be done with a solution like that, it's hard to operate without it. The Hana distraction pad is a simple advancement to patient positioning, but a great testament to how innovation impacts the orthopedic space. It's one small change that adds significant outcomes. The soft disposable friction based pad enables you to remove the perineal post, allowing for post free hip procedures on the HANA table. It contributes to advanced post free techniques for hip preservation, ergonomic, and easy patient transfer while keeping the full functionality of the HANA table in the supine position. The HANA Distraction Pad is the only validated solution for post free hip distraction on the HANA table. More options for your HANA and continued outstanding patient results. Learn more about how the Hana Distraction Pad is transforming orthopedic surgery By visiting Mizuho OSI at this year's Anterior Hip Foundation meeting and now back to our podcast. So looking back, um, on your educational journey, uh, to, to sort of adopting anterior approach, what would you have done differently?

Alexander Sah:

that's a good question. You know, if if anything I would have done differently, Joe is I probably would have done it sooner in my career. I probably waited longer than I needed to. And really, the reason that prompted me at least was learning from people I trusted. And I think that's like anything else that we do as surgeons. We don't adapt or adopt to new technologies until we learn from someone we know who does it. And that's what really makes the Andrew Hitt Foundation unique. The faculty and the people who are members, because they're all willing to teach. It is amazing. You can ask anyone a question anytime. They're willing to help. They know everyone has questions and been through that journey. I think the support system is really what sets it apart.

Joseph M Schwab:

How about Michael? What would you have done differently?

Michael Blankstein:

I must say, I, I really have no regrets, I'm happy, um, by the time I had done it, I was, you know, I've really mastered the posterior approach, which is nice. We actually now have the opposite problem, that so many people are so only with the anterior approach that they lost their posterior approach skills. So I've kind of like mastered that, um, and then, uh, you know what I tell my residents, I go, aren't we so lucky that we get to do the surgery after people like Joe Maddow I've already figured everything out for us. Like, like, like had I tried it earlier, I probably would have maybe given up on it. But by the time that I tried, we had again, everything, all the broaches figured out, all the x rays figured out the stems, the just like also well laid out. It was actually a really fun. I think that I chose the right time to join, to join the party.

Joseph M Schwab:

For both of you, you mentioned different types of educational opportunities between industry courses and academy style courses, surgeon vision, visitation and online videos. What was your preferred way to learn then? And do you think that would be the same way that you would learn now? Or with your experience, is there a different sort of learning style that you would gravitate towards?

Alexander Sah:

It's a great question, Joe. I think, you know, when COVID came and we thought everything was going to move onto the Internet and be web based, some things have, but some things have not. So I was sort of surprised that not everything's gone that route. Really, What I've learned is you cannot get away from in person training. There's really nothing better than cadaver training being with your peers. I think learning from obviously experts in the field has huge value. I think learning from people you know is also incredibly helpful because then you have a relationship and you can ask them questions later. You can talk to them when you do your first cases. And I think The modern technologies such as cameras that can let you watch live surgery or have video recordings that are so prevalent now really help because you're going to go to a cadaver course, you might not do your first case for three to four weeks later. So to have that refresher, to have something available to review, I think makes it a lot easier doing that first case.

Michael Blankstein:

Yeah, I agree. I think again, obviously we have more great videos now and great everything now, but the mentorship model here is, I think it's still the key. If you are to transition. mid career. You need to really have some support around you. So just like a yeah, I've flown in to see multiple surges before I did my first one and I asked somebody to be in the or with me for that first one. I know, Joe, you guys did your first like 50 together. You, you and your partner, something like that.

Joseph M Schwab:

That's correct.

Michael Blankstein:

Yeah. So I think that's a, that's a big one. Cause what you don't want to do is find yourself in a situation where once I can, I, I can't expose that femur or I, I had a little crack in the calcar and I don't know how to put a cable on through the front. So definitely be ready to handle that.

Alexander Sah:

just going to say, Joe, there's no reason to reinvent the wheel when you're starting, right? There are plenty of people willing to help. So take advantage of those who want to help you get through it.

Joseph M Schwab:

Have been any surprising moments for you in this journey or since you adopting anterior approach, uh, as sort of the primary approach in your practice?

Alexander Sah:

I think the surprise for me was that I literally never went back to posterior approach after doing those anterior hip replacements, the benefits of it were remarkable. So when you hear about them being as great as they are, you wonder if it's really just being over popularized or being exaggerated. But again, my mini posterior approaches were doing very, very well and I was very happy with it. But the benefits I found from anterior approach, having patients supine, having the ability to use CRM, having the ability to restore leg length offset and have quicker recovery, all these things that are said really you would see in patients in the recovery. So that's really what surprised me is that I really didn't have any hesitation to just move 100 percent forward with that approach.

Michael Blankstein:

yeah, same again, same benefits. One of my earliest day experiences was actually a working with the therapist then I got, thank God you don't have these precautions anymore. well, I didn't realize my precautions were such a big deal. But to be able to tell patients, hey, whatever you want within reason. Just avoid extreme legs of motion, a range of motion, and that's it. That was cool. Because in the beginning, you know, with the posterior approach, even though we have data showing you probably don't need precautions, most of us still Like some gentle precautions and to be able to just let go of that altogether is, I think is, it means a lot to the patients. But again, I want to highlight one of the things that, um, that is really important here in my Okay. So again, if you look at the, if you look at the science behind anterior versus posterior approach, the differences are very small still till today, right? We're talking about if patients do well at three months, they're probably going to do well with both approaches. Because if you have a surgeon Who's able to do a good job, meaning, again, restore the length, length so we're going to go ahead and get started, and we're going to go ahead and get started and feel as natural as I can the first day. sure you that. Why are we not who that? interested Uh, Service. Uh, Uh, Based, Of Marketing Of Portfolios. Based. Um, And of Course, Basearchy. Uh, And. making the recovery easier. And also knowing Yeah.

Joseph M Schwab:

Join me next week for part two of my conversation with Dr. Alex Sah and Dr. Michael Blankstein. Thank you for listening to this episode of the AHF Podcast. Remember to like and subscribe so we can reach a wider audience. I. If you have an idea for a topic, leave it in the comments. Remember, you can find us in audio podcast form in your favorite podcast app, as well as in video form on YouTube slash at anterior hip Foundation, all one word. New episodes of the AHF Podcast come out on Fridays. I'm your host, Joe Schwab, asking you to keep those hips happy and healthy.

People on this episode